Posted on by L&R Forum

Around the Web

Here are some important law-and-religion news stories from around the web:

  • The U.S. Department of Education determined that a school district in New Jersey violated federal law by asking students about their religious identities without parental consent.
  • In two separate cases concerning Covid vaccine requirements, the 7th Circuit ruled that claims for religious exemptions under Title VII may include secular as well as religious elements.
  • A federal district court in Maine rejected both parties’ motions for summary judgment in Pines Church v. Hermon School District, in which a church claims a school district discriminated against it, based on religion, by denying the church’s application for a long-term lease. The court ruled the case must go to trial.
  • In Gethsemani Baptist Church v. City of San Luis, the US Department of Justice filed a statement of interest indicating that a Baptist church could file an RLUIPA challenge to city zoning laws without first applying for a conditional-use permit.
  • In Athey Creek Christian Fellowship v. Clackamas County, an Oregon federal district court dismissed an RLUIPA claim concerning a requirement for a conditional use permit to build additions to a church building. The court held that requiring the plaintiff to reapply did not resemble what traditionally constitute substantial burdens under the RLUIPA.
  • In Frankel v. Regents of the University of California, a federal judge ordered the University of California to devise a plan to curb the antisemitic treatment of Jewish students on campus.
Posted on by Mark Movsesian

On Suarez and “Law from Below”

As readers of our weekly Scholarship Roundup know, natural law is making a comeback in certain quarters of the American legal academy–a comeback that reflects concerns about the positivism that underlies prevailing theories like originalism and textualism. For most American law professors, natural law means Aquinas. But medieval jurisprudence isn’t the only natural-law game in town. A new book from Georgetown University Press discusses the work of a leading figure of the so-called “second scholasticism” at the time of the Counter Reformation, the Spanish Jesuit Francisco Suarez. The book is Law from Below: How the Thought of Francisco Suarez, S.J., Can Renew Contemporary Legal Engagement, by scholar Elizabeth Rain Kincaid (Loyola University New Orleans). Here’s the description from the Georgetown website:

The current political atmosphere would suggest that law is imposed only from above, specifically by the chief executive acting upon some sort of perceived populist mandate.

In Law from Below, Elisabeth Rain Kincaid argues that the theology of the early modern legal theorist and theologian, Francisco Suárez, SJ may be successfully retrieved to provide a constructive model of legal engagement for Christians today. Suárez’s theology was developed to combat an authoritarian view of law, suggesting that communities may work to change law from the ground up as they function within the legal system, not just outside it. Law from Below suggests that Suárez’s theory of law provides a theologically robust way to mount a counter-narrative to contemporary authoritarian theories of law, while still acknowledging the good in the rule of law and its imposition by a legislative authority. Suárez acknowledges the crucial contribution of citizens to improving law’s moral content, without removing the importance of law’s own authority or the role of the lawgiver.

Law from Below argues that the dialogue between legislators and the community provides Christian activists with a range of options for constructively engaging with law in order to have a positive impact on society.