Here are some important law-and-religion stories around the web:
- A petition for certiorari was filed in the U.S. Supreme Court in North American Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention, Inc. v. McRaney, a case in which the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals denied review of a decision refusing to invoke the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine in a dispute between the Mission Board and its former executive director.
- A petition for certiorari was filed in the U.S. Supreme Court in California Parents for the Equalization of Educational Materials v. Torlakson, a case in which the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of a suit claiming the California’s History-Social Science Standards and Framework treats Hinduism negatively in relation to other religions.
- The U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals struck down an Arkansas statute requiring businesses that enter contracts with public entities to certify that they will not engage in any boycott of Israel.
- The U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed for lack of standing a suit by a secular humanist organization challenging a Texas law that refuses to allow secular celebrants to conduct marriage ceremonies.
- Suit was filed in a Pennsylvania federal district court seeking to declare unconstitutional the position taken by the Bucks County, Pennsylvania clerk of courts that ministers who were ordained online may not solemnize marriages under Pennsylvania law.
- A trial court in the Canadian province of British Columbia refused to issue an interlocutory injunction requiring three churches to comply with COVID-19 public health orders banning in-person religious services.
- Jordan’s Judicial Council issued a memo changing the legal status of around sixty Christian denominations in the country.

Hindus, he is even blamed by some for setting into motion conflicts that would result in the creation of a separate Muslim state in South Asia. In her lively overview of his life and influence, Audrey Truschke offers a clear-eyed perspective on the public debate over Aurangzeb and makes the case for why his often-maligned legacy deserves to be reassessed.
separation between the two has proved contentious: the state is involved in various ways in the direct administration of many religious institutions; and courts are regularly asked to decide on rights linked to religious functions and bodies. Such decisions contribute to (re)defining religious categories and practices.
Whether defined by family, lineage, caste, professional or religious association, village, or region, India’s diverse groups did settle on an abstract concept of law in classical times. How did they reach this consensus? Was it based on religious grounds or a transcendent source of knowledge? Did it depend on time and place? And what apparatus did communities develop to ensure justice was done, verdicts were fair, and the guilty were punished?