Here is an interesting collection of essays that seems to derive from this very worthwhile project concerning Christian persecution in areas of Asia, Africa, and Latin America, as well as the response of Western nations. Under Caesar’s Sword: How Christians Respond to Persecution (CUP), edited by Daniel Philpott and Timothy Samuel Shah. Well worth checking out.

The global persecution of Christians is an urgent human rights issue that remains underreported. This volume presents the results of the first systematic global investigation into how Christians respond to persecution. World-class scholars of global Christianity present first-hand research from most of the sites of the harshest persecution as well as the West and Latin America. Their findings make clear the nature of persecution, the reasons for it, Christian responses to it – both non-violent and confrontational – and the effects of these responses. Motivating the volume is the hope that this knowledge will empower all who would exercise solidarity with the world’s persecuted Christians and will offer the victims strategies for a more effective response. This book is written for anyone concerned about the persecution of Christians or more generally about the human right of religious freedom, including scholars, activists, political and religious leaders, and those who work for international organizations.

When I used to teach Professional Responsibility, I always assigned a wonderful piece by Thomas Shaffer called, “On Living One Way in Town and Another Way at Home.” The piece uses a short story by Louis Auchincloss to illustrate the importance of leading a life within the law of integrity–in the denotative sense of an integration of one’s professional and non-professional ethical self.

Here is a book, admittedly not really about religion at all, that also appears to be an exercise in advocacy for moral education for lawyers. But it takes, as it were, a rather different view. Dangerous Leaders: How & Why Lawyers Must be Taught to Lead (Stanford UP) by Anthony C. Thompson.

Flint, Michigan’s water crisis, the New Jersey “Bridgegate” scandal, Enron: all these incidents are examples of various forms of leadership failure. More specifically, each represents marked failures among leaders with legal training. When we look closer at one profession from which we often draw our political, business, and organizational leaders—the legal profession—we find a deep chasm between what law schools teach and what the world expects. Legal education ignores leadership, sending the next generation of legally-minded leaders into a dynamic world dangerously unprepared.

Dangerous Leaders exposes the risks and results of leaving lawyers unprepared to lead. It provides law schools, law students, and the legal profession with the leadership tools and models to build a better foundation of leadership acumen. Anthony C. Thompson draws from his fifteen years of experience in global executive education for Fortune 100 companies and his experience as a law professor to chart a path forward for better leadership instruction within the legal academy. Using vivid, real-life case studies, Thompson explores catastrophic political, business, and legal failures that have occurred precisely because of a lapse in leadership from those with legal training. He maintains that these practices are chronic leadership failures that could have been avoided. In examining these patterns of failures, it becomes apparent that legal education has fundamentally misread its task.

Thompson proposes a fundamental rethinking of legal education, based upon intersectional leadership, to prepare lawyers to assume the types of roles that our increasingly fast-paced world requires. Intersectional leadership challenges lawyer leaders to see the world through a different lens and expects a form of inclusion and respect for other perspectives and experiences that will prove critical to maneuvering in a complex environment. Dangerous Leaders imparts invaluable tools and lessons to best equip current and future generations of legal leaders.

If it seems that the conflict between “religion” (at least understood in a certain way) and “human rights” (also understood in a certain way) has been heating up for a while (Mark, among others, has written about rival concepts of “dignity” in these areas), here is a new book that vindicates that view, explores the conflict, and proposes to mitigate it (at least a little). Litigating Religions: An Essay on Human Rights, Courts, and Beliefs (OUP) by the noted human rights scholar Christopher McCrudden.

Religions are a problem for human rights, and human rights are a problem for religions. And both are problems for courts. This book presents an interpretation of how religion and human rights interrelate in the legal context, and how this relationship might be reconceived to make this relationship somewhat less fraught.

Litigating Religions, an essay adapted by Christopher McCrudden from the Alberico Gentili Lectures given at the University of Macerata, Italy, examines how the resurgent role of religion in public life gives rise to tensions with key aspects of human rights, in particular freedom of religion and anti-discrimination law, and how these tensions cannot be considered as simply transitional.

The context for the discussion is the increasingly troubled area of human rights litigation involving religious arguments, such as wearing religious dress at work, conscientious objections by marriage registrars, admission of children to religious schools, prohibitions on same-sex marriage, and access to abortion. Christopher McCrudden argues that, if we wish to establish a better dialogue between the contending views, we must address a set of recurring problems identifiable in such litigation. To address these problems requires changes both in human rights theory and in religious understandings.